
4 JUN, 2026
By Joanna Piwko from RankiaPro Europe

The first quarter of 2026 closed with a negative balance for emerging market debt. The war in Iran and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz have caused energy prices to skyrocket, triggering a sell-off that interrupted a series of positive quarters and widened spreads. The reaction of many investors was to reduce exposure, bringing flows back to developed markets.
Yet the underlying data tells a different story. The macro fundamentals of emerging markets are today structurally stronger than in previous stress cycles: improved public budgets, inflation in retreat, positive real rates in many economies. The sell-off reflects more of a reversal of recent gains than a real deterioration. For medium-term horizon investors, the question is not whether emerging debt offers value, but where to position and with which tools.
The dollar is the most relevant macroeconomic variable for EMD returns. A weakening dollar tends to support emerging currencies, improve export competitiveness, and reduce the real weight of foreign currency-denominated debt. Jason Trujillo, Head of Emerging Market Credit and Strategy at Invesco, notes that "dollar cycles can last for years, driven by growth and interest rate differentials, as well as changes in global risk propensity."
If the headwind that penalized emerging assets between 2022 and 2024 continues to dissipate, the context becomes structurally more favorable, particularly for local currency bonds. This view is shared by Kristin Ceva, Head of Emerging Country Strategies at Payden & Rygel, who points out that the dollar is already showing "signs of weakening" compared to the past, opening up spaces for a revaluation of emerging currencies capable of triggering "a virtuous circle, supporting growth, consumption and capital flows to these countries."
Michael Ganske, Portfolio Specialist at T. Rowe Price, clarifies that emerging economies are facing this period with "stronger balances, lower inflation and higher real interest rates" compared to previous cycles, factors that soften the impact of external shocks. Trujillo (Invesco) adds that several countries have "faced the recent global inflationary shock having already tightened monetary policy in a timely and decisive manner", creating room to stimulate growth instead of defending currency stability.
Ceva (Payden & Rygel) confirms that in the last three years there has been a "widespread improvement in macroeconomic fundamentals, with inflation under control, positive real rates and numerous sovereign rating upgrades." This is coupled with the still light positioning of investors: after years of outflows, global exposure to EMD remains skewed in favor of developed markets, leaving room for significant reallocations even with relatively contained flows.
Bonds in local currency offer two simultaneous sources of return: local rates and currency appreciation. In a scenario of a weak dollar, this potential adds up, generating higher total returns. Trujillo (Invesco) is clear: "within emerging market debt, we believe that debt in local currency represents the best opportunity."
Debt in strong currency, typically issued in dollars, plays a more defensive role: it offers constant carry and simple integration into global portfolios, but the upside potential is limited when spreads are already compressed. The compromise of the local currency, warns Trujillo, is volatility: emerging currencies can suffer strong declines during global risk shocks, even when local rates hold.
Emerging debt includes over 70 countries in five distinct regions, with deeply different economic and political structures. The data from the last 12 months confirm this: in the strong currency segment, Venezuelan securities have generated +138%, Senegalese debt has marked over -13%, while China and Indonesia have settled between +6% and +7%.
On the local currency front, the overall yield was +19% in the last 12 months, with India at +2.4%, Mexico at +37% and South Africa at +47%. Ganske (T. Rowe Price) adds a regional reading: commodity exporters like Brazil and Mexico are "positioned to benefit from the rise in energy prices", while part of Asia remains more exposed to the increase in import costs.
The main risk, according to Trujillo (Invesco), is "a reversal of the downward trend of the US dollar": if the Federal Reserve maintained a more restrictive policy longer than expected, financial conditions in EMs would worsen. This is compounded by other structural risks:
Ganske (T. Rowe Price) reminds that "volatility will persist, given geopolitical uncertainty and sensitivity to energy markets", but emphasizes that the recent widening of spreads is creating better conditions for active investors.
The Q1 2026 sell-off has not changed the structure of the opportunity: it has made it more accessible. Ganske (T. Rowe Price) defines the current moment as "more of a reset than an alarm bell", with medium-term prospects remaining constructive.
EMD is no longer purely a tactical exposure. Ceva (Payden & Rygel) reminds us that today it is "a mature and more efficient asset class than in the past, characterized by greater transparency, a sophisticated investor base and a growing role of domestic players in local markets." Local currency offers the greatest asymmetry in the medium term; strong currency ensures complementarity and income. In both cases, active country selection remains the necessary condition to capture the return.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, tax or legal advice, nor an offer to buy or sell financial instruments. The opinions reflect the evaluations of the respective management companies at the date of publication and are subject to change without notice. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Emerging market debt involves specific risks: currency volatility, geopolitical risk, liquidity risk, sovereign and corporate credit risk.